Skip to main content

2026 Boulder Budget – Staffing

Since the pandemic staffing levels have risen significantly.


Staffing Levels 

Between 2019 and 2025 the city of Boulder increased staffing by 191 Full Time Equivalent (FTE) employees.  Graph 1 shows 1426 FTE in 2019 and 1539 FTE in 2023 for a net increase of 113 FTE.

In 2024 the Library was spun off reducing staff by 78 FTE. Those positions were distributed to other departments and by 2025 the workforce was once again at 1539.

Even though 2026 is an austerity budget, overall staffing rises to 1548 with the addition of city council members as full time employees. 

The total increase from 2019 to 2026 is 200 FTE.  This representing a 14% increase in headcount.

Graph 1 – Staffing Levels (FTE)

Department201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
City Attorney’s Office25.725.727.727.728.028.027.024.025.026.027.027.0
City Clerk’s Office3.03.04.04.04.04.04.0
City Council0.00.00.00.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.010.0
City Manager’s Office18.513.015.918.914.015.09.017.718.719.725.826.8
Climate Initiatives21.018.019.018.020.022.022.0
Communication8.512.813.514.815.316.317.820.529.329.433.033.5
Community Vitality46.546.549.048.347.248.040.941.944.146.347.335.3
Facilities&Fleet33.435.536.332.534.236.337.542.246.252.951.952.9
Finance38.744.547.648.144.047.042.045.049.048.250.950.9
Fire-Rescue121.3124.3124.0124.0123.0124.0122.0133.0138.0142.0142.0140.0
Human Resources24.624.423.423.423.023.022.024.032.027.028.028.0
Housing&Human Services37.237.236.236.248.648.844.349.161.366.066.864.8
Information Technology37.240.340.839.841.844.039.046.551.957.261.261.5
Library & Arts78.578.577.577.577.880.368.877.877.8
Municipal Court21.121.120.419.418.418.416.416.418.418.418.416.4
Open Space & Mountain Parks102.4117.2128.4125.4121.6125.4126.4127.4136.5145.6147.6142.6
Parks & Recreation130.4136.4139.1146.4141.5145.3125.8134.0142.8151.5153.3151.6
Planning, Housing & Sustainability109.6115.4122.6129.3111.6111.588.492.496.797.798.7122.7
Police288.0290.9291.9291.8288.3289.3280.6288.9285.5282.0284.5280.5
Transportation70.371.473.669.069.275.277.081.591.997.698.991.4
Utilities166.9168.0168.9172.7173.8173.9168.2178.6176.0180.9181.1190.6
Total1361.81405.91440.51448.91426.11475.41375.81460.71539.61509.11539.11548.3

Table 1 – Staffing Levels (FTE) by Department 2015-2026

Source:


Staffing Changes 

From 2019 to 2025 some departments experienced significant changes.

  • Two departments effectively ceased to exist over this period:
  • The City Clerk’s Office was folded into the City Manager’s Office
  • Library & Arts was spun off into a Library district.
  • Planning, Housing & Sustainability shows a -12% change as a result of moving code enforcement to the Police department.
  • Communications grew 116% over that period.

The increase in staff size seen between 2019 and 2025 has the knock-on effect that support services also have to grow to service the additional FTEs. Table 2 shows the changes to staff size for each department. The 4 fastest growing departments are providing primarily internal support to themselves and public facing departments.

Resources required to support a growing workforce are not limited to additional FTEs but also includes employment benefits such as health insurance, pensions, real estate required to house the additional FTEs and Information Technology to provide digital support.

DepartmentChange (%)Change (FTE)Service Type
Library & Arts-100%-77.8Public
City Clerk’s Office-100%-4.0Public
Planning, Housing & Sustainability-12%-12.9Public
City Attorney’s Office-4%-1.0Public
Police-1%-3.8Public
Municipal Court0%0.0Public
City Council0%0.0Public
Community Vitality0%0.0Public
Utilities4%7.3Public
Parks & Recreation8%11.8Public
Fire-Rescue15%19.0Public
Finance16%6.9Internal
Open Space & Mountain Parks21%26.0Public
Human Resources22%5.0Internal
Housing & Human Services37%18.2Public
Transportation43%29.7Public
Information Technology47%19.5Internal
Facilities & Fleet52%17.7Internal
City Manager’s Office84%11.8Internal
Communication116%17.8Internal

Table 2 – Staffing Changes from 2019 to 2025

2026 shows little growth among departments except for:

  • In 2024 Ballot item 2C passed, which increases City Council pay to 40% of AMI. This accounts for the +9 FTE in City Council numbers
  • The big change is moving 24 FTE to Planning, Housing & Sustainability (PHS)
  • Community Vitality transfers parking enforcement to PHS.
  • Police transfer code enforcement positions to PHS.
DepartmentChange (%)Change (FTE)Service Type
Community Vitality-25%-12.0Public
Municipal Court-11%-2.0Public
Transportation-8%-7.4Public
Open Space & Mountain Parks-3%-5.0Public
Housing & Human Services-3%-2.0Public
Fire-Rescue-1%-2.0Public
Police-1%-4.0Public
Parks & Recreation-1%-1.6Public
Human Resources0%0.0Internal
Finance0%0.0Internal
Climate Initiatives0%0.0Internal
City Attorney’s Office0%0.0Public
Information Technology0%0.3Internal
Communication2%0.5Internal
Facilities & Fleet2%1.0Internal
City Manager’s Office4%1.0Internal
Utilities5%9.5Public
Planning, Housing & Sustainability24%24.0Public
City Council900%9.0Public

Table 3 – Staffing Changes from 2025 to 2026

Source:


Staffing Costs

The costs of increasing staff size over the last 6 years as well as changes proposed for the 2026 budget can be seen in the Combined Budget Summary shown in Graph 2 and Table 4.  This summary aggregates the costs of personnel, internal services, operating expenses, debt service and capital projects.

What this data shows is:

  • From 2019 to 2025 the cost of personnel rose from $149M to $205M or 37%.
  • The cost of internal services increased from $17M in 2019 to $62M in 2025 or 264%.
  • For 2026 the amount devoted to capital projects will be sharply lower than the previous 3 years.
  • In the face of no staff reductions, the capital budget is absorbing all of the cuts, mainly for Facilities & Fleet.

Graph 2 – Combined Budget Summary

Combined Budget Summary2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Personnel$146M$148M$149M$149M$151M$167M$194M$204M$205M$219M
Operating$74M$84M$96M$133M$94M$128M$124M$139M$145M$148M
Internal Services$28M$18M$17M$22M$26M$42M$42M$49M$62M$66M
Debt Service$35M$28M$22M$13M$28M$31M$34M$32M$42M$40M
Capital$101M$112M$71M$43M$69M$66M$173M$147M$207M$121M
Total$385M$389M$354M$361M$367M$434M$567M$571M$661M$594M

Table 4 – Combined Budget Summary 2017-2026

Source:


Peer Cities 

When looking at the performance of an institution it is useful to compare them to their peers.

The comparative metric for Table 5 is FTEs per 100,000 residents of a city.

In this group Boulder is in the top 5 for most FTE per resident.

CityFTE/100,000FTEPopulation
Ann Arbor728849116600
Durham7912404304000
College Station8181047.5128100
Madison8372375.85283700
Iowa City853649.776200
Provo859963.8112200
Mountain View875709.581100
Eugene9451683.5178200
Gainesville9861461.75148200
New Haven10311433139000
Fort Collins11491960.65170600
Tempe11592235.4192800
Chapel Hill1197783.7465500
Evanston1222894.4673200
Santa Barbara12801088.1585000
Huntsville14073261231700
Rochester14422955204900
Boulder14741539.1104400
Berkeley15131747115500
Cambridge15521834118200
Syracuse16542395144800
Pasadena18472406.88130300

Table 5 – Staffing Levels Among Peer Cities

Source:

  1. FTE Data: 2025 budget documents downloaded from the peer cities
  2. Population Data: https://worldpopulationreview.com/
PLAN-Boulder County
Plan Boulder County
P.O. Box 4682
Boulder, CO 80306
advocate@plan-boulder.org

Boulder nature photos courtesy of Bob Carmichael, Tom LeCount, and Peter Mayer
Subscribe to our newsletter
The latest news, articles, and resources, sent to your inbox weekly.
© 2026 All Rights Reserved | PLAN-Boulder County